This is a reprint of a comment left here:
It is a response to this article, written by Warren Spector:

Some “exceptions that prove the rule” in all of your “videogames can be marginalized” points: Regarding the end of Vaudeville, the Age of Radio, and Broadway’s margin, musicals are still created, and thanks to Moulin Rouge (which I hate, btw) musical movies made a quick and temporary comeback. I also once read all the Walt Kelly Pogo books at Boston Public Library, but your point is well taken. It’s there for you if you like that sort of thing, but the “greater public” does not care.

Aren’t all the forms of entertainment headed for this sort of marginalization?

The record industry is over, as far as I can tell. Not that I stopped listening to music, and not that there aren’t acts occasionally filling gigantic stadia, but that sort of thing isn’t so important in the public psyche; music has become a personal, private thing. I think the notion of “hit singles” is over.

Sports are experiencing this a little bit, too. Note the difference between the audiences of the NFL, the NBA, the NHL, Major League Baseball, and Major League Soccer. There are people that follow all five, but there are a lot more people that only like to follow one or two, and to be frank, I have a hard time finding people my age that like to watch professional sport at all. The money troubles of pro sports teams are well publicized.

As the digital age makes marginal movies easier to access, and home theaters beat out the shoebox at the mall, you’ll see budget rearrangement there too.

We have too many choices in entertainment to stick with any one kind and not seem like one-dimensional people. With so much cheap and available content, you have to count on all the entertainment forms being marginalized in some way.

Thanks for the comment.

Mister_Green: Yeah, I expected nothing but turbulence from the Sex Pistols, although I agree that they ought to have some kind of exhibit in the hall- they inspired too many folks not to have something there.

I wish people wouldn’t try to raise character of an individual when it comes to remembering these folks; you’re either historically important or you aren’t, and that’s it. History books remember Caligula and Stalin and they’ll remember Pol Pot, so why not Sid Vicious and Johnny Rotten?

I’ll write a real, un-reprinted one later (unless you like reprinted opinions… it’d be a… different format, anyway…)

Hope everybody’s doing well…

See you next time.



  1. In responce to your comment:After talking to my cousin about the movie, after initially posting it, I don’t think that’s what happened in the States. I think how they explained everything was that the UK leaders became oppressive to prevent the same thing happening there that did here (the civil war)…or something like that. That was the only part that I was a little lost about, during the movie, because it was really briefly mentioned.Here’s how I think it goes: We had a civil war that ruins our country. The UK sees one of the wealthiest, most powerfull, countries in the world crumble. Their leaders blame this on religious reasons (sin), and become opressive to prevent such from happening to them. Anyone seen as sinfull by the people in power are either imprisoned or executed… which leads to the majority of the movie.


  2. RYC:Thanks for the comments. I’m horrable at setting short-term goals, but I’m working on it. The milestone thing seems similar to short-term goals but less specific, I can do that, thanks for the suggestion.Oh and I just turned 22 on the 5th.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s